So – an Index of the Flowers in filmmaker Derek Jarman’s
book Modern Nature. The immediate and I think reasonable reaction
is, oh god why? The only answer that I can give to that involves giving you a brief history of how I fell down this particular rabbit hole.
The thing about Derek Jarman’s work is that, as awesome and
endlessly inspiring I find it to be, I freely acknowledge it is not easy. This is probably why writing on his work
comes pretty much exclusively from serious queer and film (and queer film)
historians – so I need to start out by saying that that isn’t really where I’m
coming from. His films are beautiful but
not always pleasant to watch and there are films I’ve got to admit have am still unable to get through Sebastian, for example, is hugely
important in gay cinema and I still haven’t finished it. (I did make it through the initial orgy but I
had to turn it off at ‘Beat him harder, Severus!’ and haven’t been able to go
back to it.)
I first encountered his work through the time-honored tradition of
trying to impress someone I really liked.
The incredibly cool girl I finally came out for at 18 was a big fan of
the 20th century logician and philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein. When she expressed excitement over having
actually found a movie about
Wittgenstein, naturally there was nothing I wanted more than to watch it with
her. (I might not have been able to keep
up with her when it came to actual conversations about logical theory, but I
could watch a movie!) I wouldn’t say
that I had low expectations for the film going into it, but I certainly did not
expect to end up falling in love with an obscure experimental filmmaker. Wittgenstein
wasn’t like anything I’d ever seen before – and the more details I learned
about the film’s production and its director, the more fascinated I
became. The many many reasons that Wittgenstein is a great film are a
subject for another post, which I do promise to write at some point.
Wittgenstein was
Derek Jarman’s second to last film. Modern
Nature is a collection of diary entries that he worked on
in the last years of his life – including the period in which he worked on Wittgenstein, which is why I first
picked up the book. As a life-long city girl
I was immediately slammed with more names for flowers than I had ever seen, and
certainly than I recognized. It was
frustrating – in these flower names there was an entire visual vocabulary that
I was completely unable to parse. I can't say that I was particularly surprised that I would find Jarman's diaries difficult given the trouble I've had with some of his films - and yet, I
really wished that the book had come with a floral index for the nature-ignorant,
like myself. Eventually, I gave up on
hoping that someone else would do this and I decided to put one
together. I’m working on that
now, and will be putting this onto a page on this blog - you'll see a link to that page on the right called 'Derek Jarman Flower Index' that will take you there. Technically it won’t be a full index with
every page a plant is mentioned on listed – but eventually it will list every plant that
Jarman references and link to a definition and a picture – in the hope that
this will help anyone picking up the book get a better sense of what
Jarman’s talking about, and give better access to the visuals of Modern Nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment